Skip to content
Service

Fintech & Payments Software Development

Core banking modernisation, card payment switching, RAAST and 1LINK connectivity, and digital wallet infrastructure for licensed institutions and EMIs.

Payments engineering is a latency and correctness problem

Payment systems fail in two directions and both are expensive. Correctness failures produce reconciliation breaks, duplicate settlements and disputes that cost more to resolve than the transactions were worth. Latency failures produce authorisation timeouts, which your scheme partners measure and your customers feel immediately.

The engineering discipline that prevents both is unglamorous: idempotency keys on every mutating operation so retries are safe, a settlement model that reconciles continuously rather than nightly, and an explicit decision about which checks run inside the authorisation path and which run after it. We make that last decision deliberately and document it, because when it happens by accident — usually as an ordering artefact of implementation — you discover it during a traffic peak.

Local rails: RAAST, 1LINK and the schemes

Pakistan-specific payment rails carry their own integration realities. RAAST instant payments impose settlement finality semantics that differ from card authorisation flows, and building both against a single internal abstraction is a common source of subtle bugs. 1LINK switch connectivity has its own message conventions and certification path.

On the card side, Mastercard and Visa integration work is dominated less by the protocol than by certification: test-case coverage, mandated message fields, and the operational evidence the schemes require. Teams that have not done it before consistently underestimate the certification calendar rather than the code.

PCI-DSS as an engineering constraint

We engineer payment infrastructure to PCI-DSS requirements: cardholder data environment scoping and segmentation, tokenisation so that primary account numbers do not propagate into systems that have no business holding them, key management with defined rotation, and logging that satisfies the audit requirements without itself becoming a leak of sensitive authentication data.

To be precise about what that does and does not mean: designing and building to the standard is engineering work we do. Formal PCI-DSS certification is issued to the entity operating the environment, following assessment by a Qualified Security Assessor. We build systems intended to pass that assessment; the certificate is yours, not ours.

What is included

  • Core banking platform development and modernisation
  • Card payment switching and authorisation host integration
  • Mastercard and Visa certification support
  • RAAST instant payment integration
  • 1LINK switch connectivity
  • Digital wallet and EMI platform engineering
  • Tokenisation and cardholder data environment scoping
  • Idempotent transaction handling and continuous reconciliation
  • Merchant onboarding and settlement workflows
  • Dispute and chargeback handling systems

Technologies and standards

Node.jsJavaGoPostgreSQLKafkaISO 8583ISO 20022RAAST1LINKPCI-DSS

Related case studies

Further reading

Questions

Fintech & Payments FAQs

Can you integrate RAAST into an existing wallet or core?
Yes, and it is one of the more common engagements we take. The main design question is whether your internal transaction abstraction can represent RAAST settlement finality correctly alongside card authorisation semantics — collapsing the two usually causes problems later.
Are you PCI-DSS certified?
No, and neither is any development firm in a way that would transfer to you. PCI-DSS certification is issued to the entity operating the cardholder data environment after assessment by a Qualified Security Assessor. We engineer systems to the standard so that your assessment goes smoothly; the certificate is issued to you.
Do you support Mastercard and Visa certification?
Yes. We have taken payment platforms through scheme certification and plan for the certification calendar explicitly, because it is more often the schedule constraint than the engineering is.
Can you modernise a legacy core banking system incrementally?
That is usually the only sane approach. We favour strangler-pattern migration — routing specific capabilities to new services behind a stable interface while the legacy core continues to run — over a cutover, which concentrates all the risk on a single night.

Related services

AML/CFT Compliance

Screening, transaction monitoring and goAML-conformant regulatory reporting, engineered into core banking, EMI and wallet platforms for institutions answerable to SBP and FMU.

Read more
Mobile Apps

Native and cross-platform applications for regulated environments: digital wallets, telemedicine, and field operations where connectivity is unreliable.

Read more
All services

See every engineering track we run, from AML/CFT compliance to cloud platform work.

Services hub
Consult our team

Talk to an architect about fintech & payments

A free 45-minute technical call with a senior engineer who has built this before. No demos, no sales scripts — bring your architecture and get an honest read on it.

Schedule a free technical review
Book a technical callSee case studies